Written November 8, 2007, in response to a friend's post on the subject:
Dude, you took a nose-dive into very murky waters with that one... My
feeling is that it's ultimately the mother-to-be's choice to keep the
baby or not, religious arguments aside, no-one can know what life
they're preventing from flowering, look at this example for instance:
A professor at the UCLA Medical School asked his students this question:
"Here
is the family history: The father has syphilis. The mother has TB. They
already have had four children. The first is blind. The second has
died. The third is deaf. The fourth has TB. The mother is pregnant. The
parents are willing to have an abortion if you decide they should.
What do you think?"
Most of the students decided on abortion.
"Congratulations," said the professor. "You have just murdered Beethoven!"
Right
and wrong cannot be taken as absolute values, and since none of us are
prescient, we can't justify abortion with a statement like," the baby
would have been worse off if we had allowed it to live"
Pro-lifers'
tend to justify their position based on the idea of a ‘special
obligation’ the mother has to the foetus, while the opposite end of the
argument follows something along these lines:
A famous violinist
needs to be put on a special life support system that requires you to be
hooked up to it continuously for nine months to facilitate his organs'
recovery from an otherwise fatal illness. while it may be nice for you
to offer this most humane of services to the comatose violinist, you're
not necessarily obligated to, even though you're the only person who can
save them..
The pro-lifers will then counter that abortion is
disanalogous, arguing that two people who willingly engage in sexual
intercourse, even with contraception, do so at the risk of creating a
foetus; and in so doing incur the above mentioned obligation which
doesn’t exist between the subject and the violinist in the example.
This
argument could go on forever, even without bringing in the complexities
of socio-economic circumstance, rape, incest, religion and myriad other
factors. What’s the solution? If the choices made by the mother are
based on love, and not hate and fear, then I think further questions of
the child’s’ successful gestation, birth and later development will
become moot…ultimately bringing the questions of willingness and ability
to raise the child back to the mother. A loving and supportive father
would help.
No comments:
Post a Comment